Comparison
Make vs Asana
A side-by-side look at Make (Visual Automation) and Asana (Task Management) — pricing, features, ideal users and our verdict.
| Make | Asana | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Visual Automation | Task Management |
| Best for | Multi-app visual integrations | Team collaboration and project execution |
| Pricing | Free 1,000 ops/mo; Core from $9/mo | Free up to 10 users; Starter from $10.99/user/mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Rating | 4.6 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Action | Visit Make → | Visit Asana → |
Make
★★★★½4.6A visual, scenario-based automation platform (formerly Integromat) with a powerful drag-and-drop builder, routers and 1,800+ app connectors. Strong balance of power and accessibility.
Pros
- ✓ Generous free tier
- ✓ Visual router & branching logic
- ✓ Cheaper per-op than Zapier
Cons
- ✕ Operations model can get pricey at scale
- ✕ Debugging complex scenarios is fiddly
Asana
★★★★4.4A clean, reliable project management tool focused on tasks, timelines and team coordination with solid rules-based automation.
Pros
- ✓ Clean, focused UX
- ✓ Strong free tier
- ✓ Reliable at scale
Cons
- ✕ Less customizable than rivals
- ✕ No native budgeting
Our verdict
For most teams, Make edges ahead thanks to its strength in multi-app visual integrations. That said, Asana is the better pick if your priority is team collaboration and project execution — choose based on the job you need done, not the brand.
Frequently asked questions
Is Make cheaper than Asana?
On entry pricing, Make is generally the cheaper option (Free 1,000 ops/mo; Core from $9/mo) versus Asana (Free up to 10 users; Starter from $10.99/user/mo). Final cost depends on your usage volume, so check how each tool meters operations or seats.
Do I need coding skills for Make or Asana?
Neither Make nor Asana requires coding for everyday use — both are built for no-code or low-code workflows.
Does Make or Asana have a free plan?
Yes — both Make and Asana offer a free tier, so you can trial each before committing.