StackRadar

Comparison

n8n vs Make

A side-by-side look at n8n (Technical Automation) and Make (Visual Automation) — pricing, features, ideal users and our verdict.

n8nMake
CategoryTechnical AutomationVisual Automation
Best forAdvanced backend workflow engineeringMulti-app visual integrations
PricingFree self-hosted; Cloud from $24/moFree 1,000 ops/mo; Core from $9/mo
Free tierYesYes
Rating4.7 / 54.6 / 5
ActionVisit n8nVisit Make

n8n

★★★★½4.7

Open-source, source-available workflow automation that runs self-hosted or in the cloud. Built for developers who want full control, custom code nodes and no per-task pricing.

Pros

  • Self-hostable at zero license cost
  • JavaScript/Python code nodes
  • No per-operation pricing when self-hosted

Cons

  • Steeper learning curve
  • Self-hosting needs technical upkeep

Make

★★★★½4.6

A visual, scenario-based automation platform (formerly Integromat) with a powerful drag-and-drop builder, routers and 1,800+ app connectors. Strong balance of power and accessibility.

Pros

  • Generous free tier
  • Visual router & branching logic
  • Cheaper per-op than Zapier

Cons

  • Operations model can get pricey at scale
  • Debugging complex scenarios is fiddly

Our verdict

For most teams, n8n edges ahead thanks to its strength in advanced backend workflow engineering. That said, Make is the better pick if your priority is multi-app visual integrations — choose based on the job you need done, not the brand.

Frequently asked questions

Is n8n cheaper than Make?

On entry pricing, Make is generally the cheaper option (Free 1,000 ops/mo; Core from $9/mo) versus n8n (Free self-hosted; Cloud from $24/mo). Final cost depends on your usage volume, so check how each tool meters operations or seats.

Do I need coding skills for n8n or Make?

n8n is more technical and rewards some coding/developer skill, while Make is designed to be used with little or no code.

Does n8n or Make have a free plan?

Yes — both n8n and Make offer a free tier, so you can trial each before committing.